{"id":868,"date":"2022-09-13T18:34:38","date_gmt":"2022-09-13T18:34:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/hello\/"},"modified":"2024-06-11T15:39:31","modified_gmt":"2024-06-11T15:39:31","slug":"hello","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/","title":{"rendered":"Zdravo"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-28f84493 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<h2 class=\"has-text-align-center wp-block-heading\">European Union Legislation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"im_para has-medium-font-size\">The <em>European Legislation<\/em> is a specialized scientific journal that studies the law and legal practice of the European Union. Considering the importance of the journal for the harmonization of domestic law with the law of the European Union, i.e. for harmonizing the legal system of the Republic of Serbia with the European legal acquis (<em>acquis communautaire<\/em>), the journal has a special importance for the achievement of strategic state goals. The journal publishes unpublished original and review scientific works, as well as expert analyzes in which new experiences from the empirical study of certain legal and political areas of European integration are offered. The magazine has been published continuously for over two decades, four times a year in four separate volumes or in the form of two issues.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<h2 class=\"has-palette-color-8-color has-text-color wp-block-heading\">\u00a0\u00a0<\/h2>\n\n\n\t\r\n\t\t<a name=\"search\" id=\"search\"><\/a>\r\n\t\t<link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"https:\/\/cdn.jsdelivr.net\/npm\/bootstrap@3.3.7\/dist\/css\/bootstrap.min.css\"\r\n\t\t\tintegrity=\"sha384-BVYiiSIFeK1dGmJRAkycuHAHRg32OmUcww7on3RYdg4Va+PmSTsz\/K68vbdEjh4u\"\r\n\t\t\tcrossorigin=\"anonymous\"\r\n\t\t>\r\n\t\t<link href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/css\/font-awesome.min.css\" rel=\"stylesheet\" \/>\r\n\t\t<style>\r\n\t\t\tselect {\r\n\t\t\t\ttext-align: center;\r\n\t\t\t\ttext-align-last: center;\r\n\t\t\t\t-moz-text-align-last: center;\r\n\t\t\t\tbackground-repeat: no-repeat;\r\n  \t\t\t\tbackground-position-x: calc(100% - 6px);\r\n  \t\t\t\tbackground-position-y: 50%;\r\n\t\t\t\tbackground-image: url(http:\/\/cdn1.iconfinder.com\/data\/icons\/cc_mono_icon_set\/blacks\/16x16\/br_down.png) !important;\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t}\r\n\t\t<\/style>\r\n\t\t<form id=\"search-form\" class=\"im_search im_search_background searchbox\" method=\"post\" action=\"search\" accept-charset=\"utf-8\">\r\n\r\n\t\t\t<div class=\"search-simple-title\">Search<\/div>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t<input id=\"maxResult\" name=\"maxResult\" value=\"25\" type=\"hidden\">\r\n\t\t\t<input id=\"sortIndx\" name=\"sort\" type=\"hidden\">\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t<div class=\"row\">\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"col-md-3 col-sm-3 col-xs-3\"><\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"col-md-6 col-sm-6 col-xs-6\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"form-group\" style=\"margin-bottom:6px\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<select name=\"searchIndex[0]\" id=\"searchIndex[0]\" class=\"form-control\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<option value=\"au\" selected=\"selected\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAuthor\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/option>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<option value=\"yr\" \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tYear\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/option>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<option value=\"kw\" \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tKeywords\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/option>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<option value=\"ti\" \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tTitle\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/option>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<option value=\"co\" \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tContent\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/option>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<option value=\"do\" \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDOI\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/option>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/select>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"col-md-3 col-sm-3 col-xs-3\"><\/div>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"col-md-12 col-sm-12 col-xs-12\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"form-group\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<input class=\"form-control\" name=\"queryItems[0]\" id=\"queryItems[0]\" value=\"\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t<div class=\"row\">\r\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"col-md-3 col-sm-3 col-xs-3\"><\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"col-md-6 col-sm-6 col-xs-6\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<button type=\"submit\" id=\"searchform\" class=\"btn btn-primary btn-block\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<i class=\"fa fa-search\"><\/i> Search\t\t\t\t\t<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"col-md-3 col-sm-3 col-xs-3\"><\/div>\r\n\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\r\n\t\t<\/form>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-28f84493 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\"><script src=\"https:\/\/code.jquery.com\/jquery-3.6.0.js\"><\/script>\r\n<script src=\"https:\/\/code.jquery.com\/ui\/1.13.2\/jquery-ui.js\"><\/script>\r\n\r\n<link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"https:\/\/cdnjs.cloudflare.com\/ajax\/libs\/viewerjs\/1.11.1\/viewer.min.css\"\r\n\tintegrity=\"sha512-XHhuZDcgyu28Fsd75blrhZKbqqWCXaUCOuy2McB4doeSDu34BgydakOK71TH\/QEhr0nhiieBNhF8yWS8thOGUg==\"\r\n\tcrossorigin=\"anonymous\"\r\n\treferrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"\r\n\/>\r\n<script src=\"https:\/\/cdnjs.cloudflare.com\/ajax\/libs\/viewerjs\/1.11.1\/viewer.min.js\"\r\n\tintegrity=\"sha512-UzpQxIWgLbHvbVd4+8fcRWqFLi1pQ6qO6yXm+Hiig76VhnhW\/gvfvnacdPanleB2ak+VwiI5BUqrPovGDPsKWQ==\"\r\n\tcrossorigin=\"anonymous\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">\r\n<\/script>\r\n\r\n<div class='is-layout-flex wp-container-3 wp-block-columns' style=\"padding-top:20px;\">\r\n\t<div id=\"coverimage\" class='is-layout-flow wp-block-column' style='flex-basis:18%'>\r\n\t\t<figure class='wp-block-image size-large is-style-default lupa' style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">\r\n\t\t\t<img decoding='async' src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/2026-94-95-cover.jpg' alt=''>\r\n\t\t<\/figure>\r\n\t\t<div id=\"full_journal\" style=\"text-align:center;\">\r\n\t\t\t<i class=\"fa fa-download\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\r\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/2026-94-95.pdf\">Full journal<\/a>\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t<div class=\"block-container\">\r\n\t   \t<div class=\"prev-issues\">\r\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/archive\">Previous<br \/>issues<\/a>\r\n\t   \t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\r\n\r\n\t\t<div class=\"block-container\">\r\n\t\t\t<div class=\"prev-issues\">\r\n\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/manuscript-submission\">Manuscript<br \/>Submission<\/a>\r\n\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div>\r\n\r\n\t<div class='is-layout-flow wp-block-column has-palette-color-6-background-color has-background im-articles-block' style='flex-basis:82%'>\r\n\t\t<div class=\"articles-title\">Latest issue: European Legislation Vol. 25 No. 94-95\/2026<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u041e\u041f\u0428\u0422\u0410 \u041f\u0418\u0422\u0410\u040a\u0410<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/1'>Europe in a world of turbulence<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0000\u20100002\u20103393\u20108076' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100002\u20103393\u20108076' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Slobodan Ze\u010devi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):11-19<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-1.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 267.02 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.1'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.1<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tThe Trump administration has freed international relations from formal obligations to respect international law and the principle of interdependence among states. In such a new world of interest\u2010driven realism, the European Union must shed legal idealism and naivety and project its power. Europe needs stronger internal economic cohesion, a more efficient decision\u2010 making model, and the preservation of the independence and culture of European peoples. Protection from migration from the African continent, whose population is growing rapidly, implies raising the birth rate. European independence, on the other hand, presupposes investment in new technologies and the development of its armaments industry. The Union thus faces several unresolved issues in completing its integration and achieving strategic stability and autonomy. The admission of the Western Balkans countries into the European Union has great economic, political, and security significance. However, due to the absence of constitutional reform, the European Union has not been able to complete this task. Today, various options are emerging regarding the admission of new member states, such as membership without the right of veto.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/2'>Repositioning the European Union in new geopolitical conditions<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0000\u20100001\u20109312\u20102194' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100001\u20109312\u20102194' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Goran Nikoli\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a>, <a content='0000\u20100003\u20103159\u20103331' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100003\u20103159\u20103331' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Jelena Zvezdanovi\u0107 Lobanova <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a>, <a content='0000\u20100002\u20101392\u20104427' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100002\u20101392\u20104427' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Petar \u0106ur\u010di\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):21-47<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-2.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 477.38 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.2'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.2<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tTrade conflicts with the United States (US) and China have accelerated the need for greater self\u2010sufficiency in key sectors of the European Union (EU). The new Industrial Acceleration Act, adopted by the European Commission in March 2026, will determine whether the \u201cMade in EU\u201d industrial policy can facilitate cooperation with trading partners while avoiding protectionist traps, particularly in relations with China. The aim is to support production in the EU. Partners covered by free trade agreements, as well as signatories of the WTO General Agreement on Government Procurement, would be allowed to participate in EU member states\u2019 public procurement. Reducing risky dependence on Washington is closely linked to efforts to open new market access opportunities for the EU. While there are more than 40 EU trade agreements with partners, many others are in the pipeline, with the two most important ones\u2014with the Southern Common Market in Latin America (MERCOSUR) and India\u2014having been signed in January this year. These agreements send a strong geopolitical signal that the participating countries want to trade and cooperate under predictable and rules\u2010based conditions. The EU and its economic partners have an opportunity to lead the world towards a new multilateralism. Ideally, countries should devise new rules on subsidies and economic security while deepening cooperation on rare earth elements and critical raw materials within the framework of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) or based on plurilateral arrangements, thereby increasing resilience in global supply chains. To remain a reliable partner, the EU must remain open. The new industrial policy aimed at strengthening the competitiveness of European industry, accelerating the green transition, and facilitating foreign investment should be more flexible with regard to numerous administrative requirements and the desire for full reciprocity in public procurement.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u0418\u041d\u0421\u0422\u0418\u0422\u0423\u0426\u0418\u0408\u0415<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/3'>Digital transformation of judicial institutions in the context of European standards of international communication<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0009\u20100008\u20101614\u20101787' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009\u20100008\u20101614\u20101787' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Pantelija Bo\u017ei\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):49-70<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-3.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 344.13 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.3'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.3<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tThe digital transformation of judicial institutions represents one of the most significant processes in the contemporary development of the European legal area, given that the application of information and communication technologies substantially affects the efficiency, transparency, and accessibility of justice. This paper analyses the European standards for digital communication in the judiciary, with particular emphasis on the development of e\u2011justice systems within the member states of the European Union and on the degree of harmonisation of the judicial system of Bosnia and Herzegovina with contemporary European trends in judicial digitalisation. Special attention is devoted to the normative and institutional framework of the European Union, standards for electronic data exchange, personal data protection, and cybersecurity issues in digital justice. The paper points out that the digitalisation of judicial institutions no longer represents a matter of technical modernisation exclusively, but rather constitutes one of the key prerequisites for efficient international judicial cooperation and the functioning of the modern concept of the rule of law. The analysis demonstrates that a certain level of progress has been achieved in Bosnia and Herzegovina in the field of e\u2011 justice. Further normative, institutional, and technical reforms remain necessary to achieve full compliance with European standards.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\r\n\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u0417\u0410\u041a\u041e\u041d\u041e\u0414\u0410\u0412\u0421\u0422\u0412\u041e<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/4'>Challenges of harmonising domestic legislation with European Union law in the field of ESG criteria implementation<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0000\u20100003\u20101327\u20100889' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100003\u20101327\u20100889' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Marijana Duki\u0107 Mijatovi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a>, <a content='0000\u20100003\u20103342\u20107257' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100003\u20103342\u20107257' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Andrea Ivani\u0161evi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):71-93<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-4.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 415.51 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.4'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.4<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tESG criteria (Environmental, Social, and Governance) are important instruments of sustainable, transparent, and responsible business practices in modern legal and economic systems. In European Union (EU) law, ESG standards have developed within a comprehensive normative framework that includes non\u2010financial reporting, climate policy, and sustainable financing. Of particular importance are the regulations governing obligations to disclose information on environmental, social, and corporate governance impacts, as well as mechanisms for encouraging green investments. The paper analyses the ESG criteria in EU law and the challenges of harmonising the Republic of Serbia\u2019s legislation with the EU acquis. The paper points to the need for further harmonisation of the domestic legal framework, especially in transparency and accountability of economic entities, as well as the practical challenges associated with implementing the regulations, including limited institutional capacities and the need to strengthen supervision. ESG regulations are important factors in the European integration process and in improving the competitiveness of the Republic of Serbia\u2019s economy.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/5'>Normative parallels of personal data protection in the European Union and in the Republic of Serbia<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0000\u20100003\u2010 1739\u20100335' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100003\u2010 1739\u20100335' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Sergej Uljanov <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):94-119<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-5.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 469.11 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.5'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.5<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tIn the era of the fourth industrial revolution, personal data has become the most valuable resource of the digital economy, yet also the most vulnerable point for individual privacy. Mass collection, algorithmic processing, and global information flows have necessitated a robust and uniform legal framework to address challenges unforeseen by traditional law. This paper analyses the degree of compliance and key normative parallels between the legal frameworks for personal data protection in the European Union and the Republic of Serbia. The central subject of the research is the relationship between the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the domestic Law on Personal Data Protection (LPDP) of 2018. The author proceeds from the thesis that the Republic of Serbia, within the European integration process, has carried out extensive harmonisation of its regulations, adopting the basic concepts, processing principles, and data subject rights from the European model. The first part of the paper examines the evolutionary processes that led to the adoption of current regulations. The central part provides a comparative analysis of institutes, such as processing principles, legal bases, and the role of supervisory authorities. Special emphasis is placed on the institutional framework, comparing the powers of the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection in the Republic of Serbia with those of supervisory authorities in EU member states, while noting significant differences in penal policy and enforcement mechanisms. The final segment of the paper is dedicated to the challenges of cross\u2010border data transfer and Serbia\u2019s prospects for obtaining an Adequacy Decision from the European Commission. Concluding remarks indicate that, despite a high rate of normative alignment, practical application and ensuring the full effectiveness of rights in the Republic of Serbia still face challenges due to specific socio\u2010legal circumstances and administrative capacities.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/6'>Regulation establishing an entry\/exit system<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0000\u20100001\u20109673\u20109149' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100001\u20109673\u20109149' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Milutin Trnavac <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):120-140<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-6.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 422.14 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.6'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.6<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tThis paper presents the main elements of the Regulation establishing an Entry\/Exit System (EES) for the registration of entry and exit data and data relating to refusals of entry concerning third\u2010country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States of the European Union (EU) as well as for determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes. The Regulation in question aims to regulate the conditions governing the entry and exit of third\u2010country nationals into and from the Member States of the EU. It establishes an electronic system to record and verify the entry and exit of third\u2010country nationals at the Union\u2019s external borders. The new rules are intended to ensure the protection of public policy, internal security, and public health within the Member States of the EU.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u0415\u041a\u041e\u041d\u041e\u041c\u0418\u0408\u0410, \u041a\u041e\u041d\u041a\u0423\u0420\u0415\u041d\u0426\u0418\u0408\u0410, \u041f\u0420\u0415\u0414\u0423\u0417\u0415\u0422\u041d\u0418\u0428\u0422\u0412\u041e<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/7'>Application of European Union law to hotel and restaurant business in the Republic of Serbia<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0009\u20100003\u20102376\u20109154' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009\u20100003\u20102376\u20109154' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Milo\u0161 Tucovi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):141-160<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-7.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 401.65 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.7'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.7<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tEuropean Union (EU) standards and regulations are the foundation of a successful hotel and restaurant business. Properly defined regulations ensure cost control, while standards guarantee uniform quality of service. EU hotel and restaurant standards are a key mechanism for ensuring high\u2010quality service, food safety, and consumer protection. Through strict regulations, categorisations and certifications, the EU guarantees a uniform customer experience and sustainable business across its market. To become compliant with EU standards in the hotel and restaurant industry, Serbia needs to transpose EU regulations and ensure their full implementation. This implies that the competent authorities carry out inspection and supervision, as well as that the necessary laboratories are in place. It is also necessary to ensure that food business operators (i.e., everyone who produces, processes, or distributes food or is otherwise involved in the chain) are well\u2010trained and aware of their responsibilities. Standards in the hotel and restaurant industry in the EU are not defined by a single universal law. They are a combination of binding regulations (e.g., food safety), voluntary standards (ISO), and industry classifications (star ratings for hotels). Hospitality establishments (hotels and restaurants) that apply professional standards achieve stable, profitable, and long\u2010term business.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\r\n\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u0424\u0418\u041d\u0410\u041d\u0421\u0418\u0408\u0415<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/8'>Regulation of the European parliament and of the Council establishing the loan cooperation mechanism and providing macro-financial assistance to Ukraine<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0000\u20100002\u20105613\u20102614' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100002\u20105613\u20102614' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Aleksandar Jazi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):161-171<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-8.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 295.79 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.8'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.8<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tUkraine has suffered significant material destruction since the start of the conflict with Russia in 2022 and therefore requires significant material resources to maintain its macro\u2010financial stability. Ensuring Ukraine\u2019s macro\u2010 financial stability is extremely important for its post\u2010war reconstruction, which is why the European Parliament and the Council adopted Regulation 2024\/2773 on Establishing a Loan Cooperation Mechanism and providing exceptional macro\u2010financial assistance on October 24, 2024. Through this mechanism, the European Union (EU) should allocate appropriate financial resources to Ukraine. In addition to EU Member States, third countries could also participate in financing Ukraine\u2019s post\u2010war reconstruction. However, the granting of loans and credits implies the fulfilment of certain conditions controlled by the European Commission. Failure to meet them could lead to the suspension of funding. Some of these conditions also concern the end of the military conflict with Russia.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u0411\u0415\u0417\u0411\u0415\u0414\u041d\u041e\u0421\u041d\u0410 \u041f\u041e\u041b\u0418\u0422\u0418\u041a\u0410<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/9'>Position and significance of European Union civilian missions<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0000\u20100001\u2010 6999\u2010876X' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100001\u2010 6999\u2010876X' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Iris Bjelica Vlaji\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):173-196<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-9.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 469.18 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.9'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.9<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tSince its establishment, the European Union (EU) has gone through several stages of development. Significantly, this international organisation has grown into a supranational community of states that share similar views on international politics and security. The process of creating the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) within it began with the Maastricht Treaty. It continues through the treaties on the functioning of the EU. Finally, the process was completed with the adoption of the Global Strategy for Foreign and Security Policy in 2016. The EU\u2019s Common Security and Defence Policy had military and civilian components. In 2003, the first EU civilian and military missions were sent to third countries. In addition, cooperation with third countries was carried out through their participation in civilian and military missions. Based on the Council conclusions of November 19, 2018, the strengthening of the civilian segment of the CSDP began. The paper analyses the legal position and significance of EU civilian missions. The analysis includes a study of the solutions adopted in primary and secondary legislation, as well as a discussion of existing EU missions. The conclusion is that civilian missions are a useful tool for cooperation between the EU and neighbouring countries as well as for strengthening the EU\u2019s presence in the international environment. Given that missions are established at the request of the host country, the status of personnel is regulated by the relevant agreements (SOMA). The inclusion of the Republic of Serbia\u2019s civilian representatives in EU missions would contribute not only to the fulfilment of its pre\u2010accession obligations under Chapter 31 but also to the professionalisation of its staff. The paper uses historical and comparative methods, as well as the content analysis of legal acts.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/10'>Geopolitical position and energy security of the Visegrad group<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0000\u20100003\u20104853\u20107694' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100003\u20104853\u20107694' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Slobodan Ne\u0161kovi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):197-217<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-10.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 435.21 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.10'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.10<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tOur paper examines the geopolitical context of the Visegrad Group\u2019s functioning. The Visegrad Group is an alliance of four Central European countries: the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Since its establishment in 1991, this group has been working to strengthen cooperation, European integration, and harmonisation of political interests within the European Union (EU). Energy security is of particular importance within the framework of cooperation, which in the current crisis environment is conditioned by antagonisms between the EU and the Russian Federation. The paper analyses the Green Transition platform, which, in addition to technical propositions, also includes a broadly conceptualised social process. Using a multidisciplinary approach, the author seeks to clarify the dependence of microregions on Russian energy sources, the structure of energy capacities, infrastructure projects, and diversification, as well as social risks and implications for the energy transition process. The current topic also deals with the analysis of political, social, and economic challenges, climate policies, and financial programmes to support their implementation. The goal of the analysis is a holistic view of the positions of the Visegrad Group (V4) countries with regard to the indigenous paradigm of geostrategic interests and long\u2010term energy security. Through the comparative scientific method, the author seeks to synthesise knowledge in this area to point out its importance for the Western Balkans and especially for the Republic of Serbia. The paper points out the internal contradictions in the Visegrad Four countries, which are particularly expressed in the current geopolitical circumstances that prevent the realisation of an inclusive energy perspective.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/11'>The redirection of European peace facility towards Ukraine and its significance for the Republic of Serbia<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0009\u20100002\u20102660\u2010848X' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009\u20100002\u20102660\u2010848X' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Uro\u0161 Popadi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):218-241<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-11.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 463.73 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.11'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.11<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tThe paper analyses the reorientation of the European Peace Facility towards Ukraine and its significance for the Republic of Serbia in the context of the changing European security environment and the increasingly pronounced geopoliticisation of the European Union\u2019s actions. Starting from the fact that the European Peace Facility was established as an extra\u2010budgetary mechanism of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) for financing activities with military and defence implications, the paper examines how this instrument, through Council decisions and subsequent accompanying acts, gradually became one of the main mechanisms for military and broader financial support for Ukraine. The analysis revealed that the initial general framework of the instrument, established by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021\/509, is already being specified in 2022 through an auxiliary measure for the supply of military equipment and platforms intended for the use of armed (lethal) force to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, while subsequent amendments increase its financial scope and expand the content of the support. Of particular importance is Council Decision (CFSP) 2024\/890, which amends the basic act itself and introduces a specific earmarked amount for Ukraine, whereby support for Ukraine no longer appears only as an individual measure but as part of a broader financial and institutional reshaping of the instrument. The paper concludes that this change is also significant for Serbia, as it indicates a strong connection between European integration and foreign policy and security coordination, especially in relation to Ukraine, Russia, and the new EU defence agenda.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/12'>Modern paradigm of corporate security and implementations of crisis management in the countries of the Western Balkans<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0009\u20100002\u20107063\u2010 153' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009\u20100002\u20107063\u2010 153' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Dejan Miliki\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):242-257<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-12.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 337.36 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.12'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.12<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tCorporate security implies an appropriate traditional social approach to the protection of European corporations, achieved by securing property, capital, and their creators. Security presupposes preventive measures against all forms of destructive threats in the field of business. In modern European business conditions, corporate security has developed into an independent business function on equal footing with other functions. Today\u2019s business of European corporations carries a certain level of risk. Adequate risk assessment and engagement in ruthless market competition are measured by quantities such as profit. For this reason, the role of corporate security and risk assessment, with appropriate managerial knowledge, is the foundation of a successful business venture. The forms of security threats may be different. However, the specifics of the above\u2010mentioned issues are \u201cmore or less\u201d identical in all EU countries, including the Western Balkans countries. The basic problem of protecting a company is that the forms of threats are constantly changing and transforming into other forms of threats until an effective way of combating them is found. All this requires a high level of material expenditure and, in particular, a great ability to understand these phenomena. Crisis management plays a major role in such activities, which, according to European standards, must predict, react, and regulate existing business problems.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\r\n\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u0415\u041a\u041e\u041b\u041e\u0413\u0418\u0408\u0410<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/13'>The no harm rule principle - a technique between the protection of state sovereignty and international environmental protection<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0009\u20100006\u20101119\u20102708' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009\u20100006\u20101119\u20102708' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Aleksandra Kastratovi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a>, <a content='0000\u20100002\u20100064\u20104987' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100002\u20100064\u20104987' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Mihajlo Vu\u010di\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):259-278<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-13.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 339.8 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.13'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.13<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tEnvironmental degradation is one of the most complex challenges facing the international community today. The core of the problem lies in the tension between the states\u2019 interests in exercising sovereign rights and the interests of environmental protection. The principle of the no\u2010harm rule in international environmental law operates as a technique for resolving these complex problems with consideration and by balancing interests. The obligation not to cause harm is an indispensable part of this principle and an operational mechanism that sets the standards of conduct required of states. This approach implies that the focus is not on the protection of ecological integrity itself but on the threshold of harm and due care, i.e., standards that are generally insufficiently legally specified. However, the urgency to protect the environment from degradation reflects an important trend of giving greater and more privileged importance to the protection of ecological values related to state\u2010centric interests.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u0420\u0415\u0413\u0418\u041e\u041d\u0410\u041b\u041d\u0410 \u041f\u041e\u041b\u0418\u0422\u0418\u041a\u0410<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/14'>The European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC): possibilities and challenges for Serbia<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0000\u20100002\u20103886\u2010722X' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100002\u20103886\u2010722X' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Valentina Ivani\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):279-299<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-14.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 387.96 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.14'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.14<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tThe paper analyses reasons why the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC), regulated by Regulation (EC) No. 1082\/2006 and then updated by Regulation (EU) No. 1302\/2013, has not become an operational instrument of integrated territorial governance in the Republic of Serbia. The fact is that Serbia already has a general legal framework for cooperation between local governments and partners from other countries; the basis at the internal legal level is found in the provisions of Articles 13 and 88b of the Law on Local Self\u2010Government, while at the international legal level, it is found in the provisions of Protocol No. 3 to the European Framework Convention on Transfrontier Cooperation, which Serbia ratified in 2018. Serbia signed the European Framework Convention on Cross\u2010border Cooperation between Territorial Communities or Authorities on May 29, 2015, and ratified it in 2016. In the Declaration made with the ratification, it is stipulated that the application of the Convention depends on the prior conclusion of interstate agreements or, in their absence, on the express consent of the governments of the countries concerned, which directly affects the activities of local self\u2010government units whose cross\u2010border activities remain subject to the approval of the national level of government. The Action Plan for Chapter 22, in measure 1.12, indicates that Serbia still lacks the basis for the application of the EGTC Regulation, including the authorities responsible for its application, approval, registration, and publication, as well as further alignment with the rules relating to public funds, public procurement, VAT, and customs. Finally, the analysis concludes that the establishment of an operational domestic EGTC system would enable Serbia to move from an ad hoc, project\u2010based approach to an institutional logic of crossborder cooperation, especially in the areas of public services, transport, tourism, education and territorial planning.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\r\n\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u041d\u0410\u0423\u041a\u0410, \u0422\u0415\u0425\u041d\u041e\u041b\u041e\u0413\u0418\u0408\u0410, \u0418\u041d\u041e\u0412\u0410\u0426\u0418\u0408\u0415<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/15'>European Union Space Programme<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0000\u20100003\u20103375\u20107280' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100003\u20103375\u20107280' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Du\u0161ko Dimitrijevi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):301-340<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-15.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 593.78 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.15'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.15<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tSince the end of the nineties of the 20th century, the European Union (EU) has been developing its own space initiatives and programmes, such as the European Geostationary Navigation System (EGNOS), Galileo, and Copernicus, which aim to respond to the needs of European citizens and the demands of EU public policies. To ensure their continuity and improve the existing space capacities in the field of providing space services and the transformation and development of digital and information and communication technologies, as well as to enable the fulfilment of priorities in the areas of climate change, transport, security, and defence, on April 28, 2021, the EU adopted Regulation 2021\/696 establishing the European Space Programme. The Regulation establishes the Programme\u2019s objectives, the budget, and forms of financing for the period from 2021 to 2027. At the same time, the Regulation establishes the EU Agency for the Space Programme (EUSPA), which replaces the European Agency for Global Satellite Navigation Systems (GNSS) established by Regulation 912\/2010 of September 22, 2010. In the work that follows, the adopted legal solutions related to the Space Programme are considered, as well as the powers of the EU agency responsible for its implementation.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/16'>Different approaches to AI governance: a comparative analysis of the UK AI security institute and the EU AI office<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0000\u20100001\u20106427\u20104244' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000\u20100001\u20106427\u20104244' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Dragana Dabi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):341-361<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-16.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 380.4 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.16'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.16<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tThis paper examines the United Kingdom\u2019s AI Security Institute and the European Union\u2019s AI Office as two prominent institutional responses to the challenges posed by the development and deployment of artificial intelligence. Building on an analysis of their mandates, organisational structures, and operational instruments, the paper explores how these two institutions shape the understanding of risks, public policy priorities, and practical mechanisms for overseeing advanced AI systems and models. A comparative approach shows that the UK AI Security Institute operates primarily as an operational body focused on technical evaluation and testing in close cooperation with the industry. On the other hand, the EU AI Office plays a central role in implementing the regulatory framework and ensuring compliance with established rules. Particular attention is given to the implications of these differences for risk governance, innovation, and the protection of societal values. The analysis of these institutions contributes to a broader understanding of contemporary models of AI governance, which are still in the early stages of development. The paper concludes that effective AI governance requires a combination of technical expertise and regulatory structuring, thereby opening space for further institutional convergence and enhanced international cooperation.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u041c\u0415\u0414\u0418\u0408\u0418 \u0418 \u041a\u0423\u041b\u0422\u0423\u0420\u0410<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/17'>General artificial intelligence and media content distribution in the European regulatory framework<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='00090002\u20109773\u20109399' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/00090002\u20109773\u20109399' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Maja Zari\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):363-375<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-17.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 323.19 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.17'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.17<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tThe development of generative artificial intelligence represents one of the most significant transformations of the contemporary media ecosystem, particularly in the field of media content distribution. While traditional distribution models were based on editorial selection and institutionally controlled channels of information dissemination, digital platforms, search engines, and algorithmic systems increasingly assume the role of key intermediaries in the public information process. In this context, generative artificial intelligence no longer functions solely as a technological tool for automation but also as an active actor in the generation, filtering, personalisation, and distribution of media content. This paper analyses the impact of the European regulatory framework on the management of media content distribution in the context of the development of generative artificial intelligence. Particular attention is devoted to the Digital Services Act (DSA), the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), and the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) as key regulatory instruments governing digital services, media freedom, and algorithmic systems within the European Union. The paper examines issues related to algorithmic transparency, systemic risks, editorial independence, and the labelling of AI generated content. The analysis demonstrates that generative artificial intelligence transforms media content distribution into a complex technological and regulatory system, thereby imposing new obligations on media management in the areas of algorithmic governance, ethical standards, and the protection of the public interest. At the same time, the European regulatory framework seeks to establish a balance between technological innovation and the preservation of democratic values within the digital public sphere.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/18'>Legal framework of the cultural heritage of Serbia and North Macedonia in the context of the acquis communautaire<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='00090002\u20105142\u20109723' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/00090002\u20105142\u20109723' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Teodora \u0106iti\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):376-391<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-18.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 366.18 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.18'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.18<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tThe paper analyses the impact of the European Union\u2019s legal acquis communautaire on the legal status and protection of Serbian historical heritage in the territory of present\u2010day Serbia and North Macedonia. The paper also reviews cultural heritage in the pre\u2010Yugoslav historical period. Starting from the international legal framework of public property, the paper examines the extent to which European law influences the resolution of issues that formally remain within the exclusive jurisdiction of states. The central hypothesis of the paper is based on the view that the European Union does not directly regulate issues of public property and historical and cultural heritage, but, through the principles of legal certainty, property protection, and good neighbourly relations, it shapes the legal and negotiating international framework in which these issues are resolved. The paper shows the European Union has limited legal capacity to protect the cultural and historical heritage of states located in third countries. In the context of Serbia\u2019s European integration, the issue refers to its cultural and historical heritage located in the territories of the successor states of the former SFR Yugoslavia, whose internal legislation is \u201cmore or less\u201d in line with European and international standards. To govern all open issues related to this heritage consistently and legally, neighbouring states should regulate these issues through diplomatic channels and the conclusion of bilateral agreements. As an illustration, consider North Macedonia, whose territory contains several significant Serbian historical and cultural sites for which appropriate legal remedies should be devised.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\r\n\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u0409\u0423\u0414\u0421\u041a\u0410 \u041f\u0420\u0410\u0412\u0410<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/19'>EU Action plan on human rights and democracy (2020-2027) - between objectives and outcomes<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0009\u20100005\u20107565\u2010154X' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009\u20100005\u20107565\u2010154X' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Ljubomir Tintor <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):393-413<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-19.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 362.66 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.19'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.19<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tThe article analyses the EU Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy (2020\u20132027) in the context of the evolution of the European Union (EU) as a normative force in international relations. It starts from the thesis that the EU has transformed its foreign policy over time from a predominantly economically oriented project to a values\u2010based actor in which human rights occupy a central place. Particular attention is paid to the normative and institutional framework of the Action Plan and its key objectives and new priorities, including digital rights, climate change, and strengthening democratic resilience. The paper suggests that the Action Plan represents a significant attempt to integrate human rights into all segments of the EU\u2019s external action but also that its soft\u2010law legal nature and complex institutional structure limit its effectiveness. In particular, it highlights the gap between normative ambitions and practical implementation, which stems from political differences among member states and competing geopolitical interests. It concludes that the Action Plan strengthens the EU\u2019s normative framework but that its transformative potential depends on consistent implementation and institutional coherence.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/20'>The effectiveness of Article 41(3) of Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0009\u20100002\u20104189\u20102212' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009\u20100002\u20104189\u20102212' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Nenad Vuk\u010devi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):414-441<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-20.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 406.85 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.20'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.20<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tArticle 41(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (EU) guarantees the right to compensation for damage caused by EU institutions or servants in the performance of their duties, in accordance with the general principles common to the laws of the Member States. On the other hand, the question arises as to how effective this guaranteed right is in practice. Since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, which made the Charter of Fundamental Rights legally binding, the General Court and the Court of Justice of the EU have continued to apply strict liability criteria, and claims for compensation for damage have rarely been successful before the courts. This paper critically assesses the effectiveness of Article 41(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which, despite being framed as a \u201cfundamental right\u201d, has had limited impact due to the entrenched doctrine of restrictive liability, according to which the EU courts prioritise institutional discretion over individual rights to compensation for damage. The result is a persistent gap between the symbolic value of Article 41(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and its effectiveness. Nevertheless, some progress has been made in several recent cases before the General Court, which will be discussed in this article.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/21'>The status of women and gender (ine)equality<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0009\u20100007\u20105668\u2010333X' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009\u20100007\u20105668\u2010333X' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Birsena Numanovi\u0107 Duljevi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):442-466<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-21.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 444.46 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.21'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.21<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tThe topic of the position of women and gender (in)equality represents an essential challenge for all relevant practitioners from ancient times and the protests of Roman women to the present day. The above phenomena have triggered numerous controversies with explicit connotations in the theory and practice of individual states. Our work considers influential postulates on this issue in democratic and totalitarian societies, starting from feminism and the axiom that the position of women depends primarily on the conglomeration of political and social freedoms and not exclusively on formal legislative regulation. By analysing and synthesising the current topic in the Republic of France, the Russian Federation, and Saudi Arabia, we will point out the specificities of gender equality in democratic and totalitarian social structures. Cognitive research implies that authoritarian regimes limit the emancipatory potential of equality, reducing it to a symbolic, i.e., controlled, pragmatic reality. It can be objectively stated that women\u2019s equality in Western democratic societies (in France) is insufficiently aligned with existing legal regulations, which is why the EU represents an important catalyst for the real, and not just formal, achievement of gender equality. On the other hand, in orthodox regimes (Russia and Saudi Arabia), women\u2019s equality has retrograde connotations, so some modernisation is needed in terms of human rights protection but also the consistent application of international legal standards.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u0421\u0423\u0414\u0421\u041a\u0410 \u041f\u0420\u0410\u041a\u0421\u0410<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\"><a href='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/article\/2026\/94-95\/22'>National identity in European Union law: between the member states\\\\<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\"><a content='0009\u20100004\u20102545\u20106626' href='https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009\u20100004\u20102545\u20106626' target='orcid.widget' rel='noopener noreferrer' style='vertical-align:top;'>Marija Vlajkovi\u0107 <img src='https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/orcidid.png' style='width:1em;' alt='ORCID iD icon'><\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):467-502<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-22.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 587.65 KB)<\/a>  \u205d <a href='https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.22'>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/iipe_ez.2026.25.94_95.22<\/a><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\">\t<div class=\"impp_abstract\">\r\n\t\t<div style=\"font-style: italic;cursor: pointer;\">Abstract \u25bc<\/div>\r\n\t\t<div style=\"text-align:justify;text-indent: 24px;margin-left:12px; margin-right:12px;\">\r\n\t\t\tThis paper analyses the role and scope of the national identity clause enshrined in Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union within the contemporary legal order of the European Union, with particular emphasis on the latest developments in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Starting from the premise that national identity does not operate as an absolute limit to the application of European Union law but rather as a legally relevant argument that must form part of a functional judicial dialogue, the paper examines the relationship between the autonomy of the legal orders of the Member States and the requirements stemming from European Union law, particularly in the context of free movement, EU citizenship, and the protection of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The first part of the paper analyses the position of the national identity clause and its normative evolution, as well as the principal doctrinal understandings of national identity as a constitutive element of the European legal order. Particular attention is devoted to the preliminary ruling procedure and the shaping of constitutional dialogue between national legal orders and the legal order of the European Union. The central part of the analysis focuses on the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning the crossborder recognition of personal and family status, particularly in cases arising from preliminary references submitted by courts in Eastern Europe. This contribution demonstrates that, in its more recent jurisprudence, the Court of Justice increasingly prioritises the effective enjoyment of rights deriving from Union citizenship and the rights guaranteed by the Charter. The national identity argument retains only a limited autonomous scope. At the same time, it is argued that, although the Court formally recognises the importance of Article 4(2) TEU, it has not developed a sufficiently clear methodology for balancing the protection of national identity against the requirements stemming from European Union law. The conclusion argues that the future development of the relationship between national identity and European Union law will largely depend on the further evolution of cooperative judicial dialogue between national courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union. The paper advances the view that Article 4(2) TEU should not be perceived as a \u201cshield\u201d against European Union law but rather as a mechanism of cooperative constitutional dialogue capable of preserving the cohesion of the European legal space while respecting the constitutional specificities of the Member States.\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t<\/div><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\r\n\t<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">\u041f\u0420\u0418\u041a\u0410\u0417\u0418<\/h3>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\">EU Foreign and Security Policy in Contemporary International Relations: Selected Case Studies<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\">Aleksandra Kastratovi\u0107<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):503-506<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-23.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 177.02 KB)<\/a> <\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\"><\/div>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\">Space Geopolitics and International Law<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\">Bojan Stojanovi\u0107<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):507-514<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-24.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 234.6 KB)<\/a> <\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\"><\/div>\t<div class=\"hr-impp-article\"><\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"article-title\">Financial Disruptions in the Era of Post-Pandemic Geopolitical Divides<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"author-line\">Dragan Petrovi\u0107<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-line\">European Legislation, 2026 25(94-95):515-518<\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"journal-links\"><a href=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/EZ\/2026\/94-95\/EZ-2026-94-95-article-25.pdf\">Full text (<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/plugins\/impp\/img\/pdf-tiny.gif\"> 178.62 KB)<\/a> <\/div>\r\n\t<div class=\"abstract-line\"><\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tjQuery(document).ready( function($) {\r\n\t\t$( \".impp_abstract\" ).accordion({collapsible: true, active: false});\r\n\t});\r\n<\/script>\r\n\t<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<script>\r\n\tconst viewer = new Viewer(document.getElementById('coverimage'), {\r\n\t\tinline: false,\r\n\t\tviewed() {\r\n\t  \t\tviewer.zoomTo(1);\r\n\t\t},\r\n  \t});\r\n<\/script>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-28f84493 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column ticss-2481069f is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"5965\" height=\"1262\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/banner2.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1213\" srcset=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/banner2.png 5965w, https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/banner2-300x63.png 300w, https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/banner2-1024x217.png 1024w, https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/banner2-768x162.png 768w, https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/banner2-1536x325.png 1536w, https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/banner2-2048x433.png 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 5965px) 100vw, 5965px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns ticss-0d8d1b7b animated slideInUp is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-28f84493 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column ticss-2481069f is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:50%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignleft size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ceeol.com\/search\/journal-detail?id=2791\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo\/ceeol.png\" alt=\"\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:25%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kanalregister.hkdir.no\/publiseringskanaler\/erihplus\/periodical\/info?id=506433\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo\/erihplus.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"166\" height=\"86\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column ticss-2481069f is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:25%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignright size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kobson.nb.rs\/kobson.82.html\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo\/kobson.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"166\" height=\"86\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-28f84493 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:25%\">\n<a href=\"https:\/\/doaj.org\/toc\/3042-0385\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><svg xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" fill=\"none\" viewbox=\"0 0 1854 400\">\r\n  <title>DOAJ Logotype<\/title>\r\n  <path fill=\"#982e0a\" d=\"M275.861 400c110.457 0 200-89.543 200-200V0c-110.457 0-200 89.543-200 200z\" class=\"logo__leaf\"><\/path>\r\n  <path fill=\"#fd5a3b\" d=\"M137.93 400c110.457 0 200-89.543 200-200V0c-110.457 0-200 89.543-200 200z\" class=\"logo__leaf\"><\/path>\r\n  <path fill=\"#fa9a87\" d=\"M0 400c110.457 0 200-89.543 200-200V0C89.543 0 0 89.543 0 200z\" class=\"logo__leaf\"><\/path>\r\n  <g fill=\"currentColor\">\r\n    <path d=\"M576 7.692v384.616h131.868c103.297 0 158.242-51.099 158.242-156.044v-72.528c0-104.945-54.945-156.044-158.242-156.044zm72.527 65.934h60.44c62.088 0 84.615 31.869 84.615 87.912v76.924c0 56.044-22.527 87.912-84.615 87.912h-60.44zM910.182 159.341v81.318c0 101.099 59.89 159.341 158.238 159.341 98.36 0 158.25-58.242 158.25-159.341v-81.318C1226.67 60.989 1166.78 0 1068.42 0c-98.348 0-158.238 60.989-158.238 159.341zm72.527-3.297c0-52.198 30.221-91.209 85.711-91.209 53.85 0 85.72 36.813 85.72 91.209v87.912c0 53.297-25.83 91.209-85.72 91.209-58.24 0-85.711-35.714-85.711-91.209zM1353.64 7.692l-106.59 384.616h74.72l23.08-85.715h134.06l23.08 85.715h74.73L1470.12 7.692zm8.24 232.967 46.7-172.527h6.6l46.7 172.527zM1853.37 7.692h-72.52v269.231c0 36.264-18.69 57.143-51.1 57.143-34.62 0-54.4-21.429-54.4-57.143v-36.264h-72.53v36.264c0 77.473 50 123.077 129.12 123.077 75.28 0 121.43-43.407 121.43-123.077z\"><\/path>\r\n  <\/g>\r\n<\/svg><\/a>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>European Union Legislation The European Legislation is a specialized scientific journal that studies the law and legal practice of the European Union. Considering the importance of the journal for the harmonization of domestic law with the law of the European Union, i.e. for harmonizing the legal system of the Republic of Serbia with the European [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-868","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"[data-prefix=\"single_page\"] .entry-header .page-title {--theme-font-size:30px;} [data-prefix=\"single_page\"] .entry-header .entry-meta {--theme-font-weight:600;--theme-text-transform:uppercase;--theme-font-size:12px;--theme-line-height:1.3;} [data-prefix=\"single_page\"] .hero-section[data-type=\"type-1\"] {--margin-bottom:40px;}","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":6},"page_title_panel":"","has_hero_section":"enabled","e89850309eb38881519ca558c698a5b4":"","hero_section":"type-1","hero_elements":[{"id":"custom_title","enabled":false,"heading_tag":"h1","title":"Home","__id":"uJ1OfaTmc7UMM62coIBRv"},{"id":"custom_description","enabled":false,"description_visibility":{"desktop":true,"tablet":true,"mobile":false},"__id":"W_iDF9HhVvjx0lw9iaQOP"},{"id":"custom_meta","enabled":false,"meta_elements":[{"id":"author","enabled":true,"label":"By","has_author_avatar":"yes","avatar_size":25},{"id":"post_date","enabled":true,"label":"On","date_format_source":"default","date_format":"M j, Y"},{"id":"updated_date","enabled":false,"label":"On","date_format_source":"default","date_format":"M j, Y"},{"id":"categories","enabled":false,"label":"In","style":"simple"},{"id":"comments","enabled":true}],"page_meta_elements":{"joined":true,"articles_count":true,"comments":true},"__id":"46_12uvkcWAzaU0lYd8au"},{"id":"breadcrumbs","enabled":false,"__id":"0eW7wpd269YANcXjX57C9"}],"49138efddab76803dae77f2814d471e3":"","hero_alignment1":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","hero_margin":40,"hero_alignment2":"center","hero_vertical_alignment":"center","35fe14a96809229756942aa9b7e7c6d4":"","hero_structure":"narrow","75215af82b134a8bdb901b77942005ba":"","page_title_bg_type":"featured_image","custom_hero_background":{"attachment_id":null},"page_title_image_size":"full","parallax":{"desktop":false,"tablet":false,"mobile":false},"9d8ba88223fe587918cac5b808d6b97a":"","hero_height":"250px","pageTitleFont":{"family":"Default","variation":"Default","size":"30px","line-height":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","letter-spacing":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","text-transform":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","text-decoration":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE"},"pageTitleFontColor":{"default":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULEDEFAULT"}},"pageMetaFont":{"family":"Default","variation":"n6","size":"12px","line-height":"1.3","letter-spacing":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","text-transform":"uppercase","text-decoration":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE"},"pageMetaFontColor":{"default":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULEDEFAULT"},"hover":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULEDEFAULT"}},"page_meta_button_type_font_colors":{"default":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULEDEFAULT"},"hover":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULEDEFAULT"}},"page_meta_button_type_background_colors":{"default":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULEDEFAULT"},"hover":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULEDEFAULT"}},"pageExcerptFont":{"family":"Default","variation":"Default","size":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","line-height":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","letter-spacing":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","text-transform":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","text-decoration":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE"},"pageExcerptColor":{"default":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULEDEFAULT"}},"breadcrumbsFont":{"family":"Default","variation":"Default","size":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","line-height":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","letter-spacing":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","text-transform":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE","text-decoration":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE"},"breadcrumbsFontColor":{"default":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULEDEFAULT"},"initial":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULEDEFAULT"},"hover":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULEDEFAULT"}},"pageTitleOverlay":{"background_type":"color","background_pattern":"type-1","background_image":{"attachment_id":null,"x":0,"y":0},"gradient":"linear-gradient(135deg,rgba(6,147,227,1) 0%,rgb(155,81,224) 100%)","background_repeat":"repeat","background_size":"auto","background_attachment":"scroll","patternColor":{"default":{"color":"#e5e7ea"}},"overlayColor":{"default":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE"}},"backgroundColor":{"default":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE"}}},"pageTitleBackground":{"background_type":"color","background_pattern":"type-1","background_image":{"attachment_id":null,"x":0,"y":0},"gradient":"linear-gradient(135deg,rgba(6,147,227,1) 0%,rgb(155,81,224) 100%)","background_repeat":"repeat","background_size":"auto","background_attachment":"scroll","patternColor":{"default":{"color":"#e5e7ea"}},"overlayColor":{"default":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE"}},"backgroundColor":{"default":{"color":"var(--theme-palette-color-6)"}}},"pageTitlePadding":{"top":"50px","bottom":"50px","left":"auto","right":"auto","linked":true},"4c37ed17c03ee461ab433be8d58a063d":"","page_structure_type":"default","4b61613f6206769021c6097d6f741419":"","content_style_source":"inherit","content_style":"wide","vertical_spacing_source":"inherit","content_area_spacing":"both","background":{"background_type":"color","background_pattern":"type-1","background_image":{"attachment_id":null,"x":0,"y":0},"gradient":"linear-gradient(135deg,rgba(6,147,227,1) 0%,rgb(155,81,224) 100%)","background_repeat":"repeat","background_size":"auto","background_attachment":"scroll","patternColor":{"default":{"color":"#e5e7ea"}},"overlayColor":{"default":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE"}},"backgroundColor":{"default":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE"}}},"content_background":{"background_type":"color","background_pattern":"type-1","background_image":{"attachment_id":null,"x":0,"y":0},"gradient":"linear-gradient(135deg,rgba(6,147,227,1) 0%,rgb(155,81,224) 100%)","background_repeat":"repeat","background_size":"auto","background_attachment":"scroll","patternColor":{"default":{"color":"#e5e7ea"}},"overlayColor":{"default":{"color":"CT_CSS_SKIP_RULE"}},"backgroundColor":{"default":{"color":"var(--theme-palette-color-8)"}}},"content_boxed_shadow":{"inherit":false,"blur":18,"spread":-6,"v_offset":12,"h_offset":0,"inset":false,"enable":true,"color":{"color":"rgba(34, 56, 101, 0.04)"}},"content_boxed_border":{"width":1,"style":"none","color":{"color":"rgba(44,62,80,0.2)"}},"content_boxed_radius":{"top":"3px","bottom":"3px","left":"3px","right":"3px","linked":true},"boxed_content_spacing":{"desktop":{"top":"40px","bottom":"40px","left":"40px","right":"40px","linked":true},"tablet":{"top":"35px","bottom":"35px","left":"35px","right":"35px","linked":true},"mobile":{"top":"20px","bottom":"20px","left":"20px","right":"20px","linked":true}},"058855ae017155326944c5cf18b6e789":"","disable_featured_image":"no","disable_share_box":"no","disable_header":"no","disable_footer":"no","07fc546d99728680386b8f19fdd22875":"","c4386adf5a565f77dd6e527c9822fce0":"","be5cbb80e63cc940d77537509eb6d6d2":"","935717be95c31ae5c353b3e8eb05a115":"","501c033cc9d534aef85d492ee98716be":"","589c0ea318dd03e043baebd879228e94":"","6f2ef8e858e987548a64e17c127f72d1":"","04154dce88c053aa23217136b84bf48b":"","2d557a33061a8bdd7f4641a7c27593d6":"","5e0ed073d394a3817486998b46f8112a":"","53de03f854bec6e5ef3df99256782717":"","b45a3de74ed90b6f9ce5d91ff13c001b":"","6ad436bbecb6972b0debb588de25062b":"","011793a2c6cc16c30799556558b9266e":"","3d15e66f6b36973714ac6af78b79d723":"","67d3024f1e66eddf524d1f99560cadee":"","fbfe2f51f49bbae48cc251a56535a9b3":"","59ccbb1b585c99b1e2b6c72536db11b5":"","86c8dd455dacb1834606a250bbe5a9dd":"","989fdecbc5e0b6201bffed1e038371f5":"","3665caca7572e1234b97a82fd395ce01":"","3031230e885995bcbe0b106988ca3db3":"","31f6610bd0bce4718154a08ad1b31f8d":"","c0d898b487edacea468902ed55b31ff1":"","f175e0074524e8fd70188ffa8c3e17a5":"","c06d7c4e02eca67e016eb7fa02848ac2":"","9ee012fe2fe7acf5e1ef5f3398f74043":"","1737b1edfde671efb496624920ee7882":"","cd2b852ac40246555f0c39136db7884c":"","9b5923297dd6c0f4f1a3ecc05f5e0471":"","c22e2b4afa926d863688bb0128dfcc99":"","20930c8b16225c95d6fd87f9be957bbc":"","f5560a744a0e17ffb576a75b7eb4d411":"","ca425808261b89ff4fbfcaab336ed02b":"","f674cb5278fec4b13bfd1397220d08ea":"","8a0f2d53aca1b4bcd80b70ed1a6d6dd5":"","b261070e093eb14227c0f55bca045851":"","70e8b9810a2e2cf8afc806dec36c33fb":"","3256797642163ecddaf10940d776b052":"","b05b8f05a5703d1f76877eede6b1dec7":""},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/868","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=868"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/868\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/evropskozakonodavstvo.rs\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=868"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}